The conclusion of the Bedini_SG list. Purposes of distinguishing the two energies has been shown and realized by those who have moved on to the next stages of learning. A public letter to the members of the Bedini_SG list. Permission to post this email in its entirety only.

As you know I stopped posting on this Bedini_SG list because Dave Ellis decided to start changing my words. As a Moderator you can put someone on moderation and then edit what they say (when they post) and make it look like they said something else. This is what one moderator did to my last words on this list as I showed on my list. This is contrary to the policy Sterling insisted upon with this list. And it was grossly hypocritical for Dave and others to accuse me of mischief in my moderating policies on my Bedini_Monopole lists (when I never did such things) while doing this to me. The moderators of the Bedini_SG list have allowed numerous people to rail unjustly upon the inventor and others, to advertise competitive technology repeatedly with the sole purpose to make a profit and tell people it is better when it is not in fact. The moderators have repeatedly disallowed me and others to respond to bogus claims against myself, my testing, and this technology. Even when Sterling made the false claim that I was once a moderator of the Bedini_SG list and I tried to respond, my simple non-controversial email was not allowed to be seen by the list (I only was given access to the peswiki website). All this and much more happened while the moderator and talkative members of Bedini_SG list were complaining of my policy on my lists as being like a dictator! It is hypocritical and deceptive to accuse someone of wrong while doing the same things yourself. If it is wrong to have any moderating policy then why do you have one?

You have created a deceptive list and that is why many do not want anything to do with it. I have followed what you are saying and see your game plans. I notice all your jabs against me continually and against John, Peter and others who make any claims at success. It is evident to many people who you people are. No one would spend all the time you people do on something if you really believed as Joe, Dave, and others do. There is evidently other motives at play. I know you guys already know this technology works as claimed and are simply trying to suppress it. Your method is flip flop. One side of the mouth speaks interest and openness and flattery, while the next moment the other side speaks misinformation, bitterness, and confusion. You overwhelm this list and other lists with numerous posts so that newcomers can never figure out what is true and what is not. Certain individuals pose as servants to help others and be the answer man only to lead them down into a road of skepticism. First you talk as if you know there is something in this as you have seen already for yourself. Then you speak totally opposite to that and say it is all a fraud and deception. This does work to confuse people and turn them off. You have been successful in your missions. But you have not prevented everyone from finding the truth.

All your posts make the claim that no one has replicated anything of any significance. You ignore all the testimony I have given. And all the others have given. Several people have opened up their shops to show the public replications. John has been the first and has done so for over 20 years! I know several of you who have visited and he was willing to show them everything, and did do it. You ignore this and deny it. Others have done the same. You are after OU and charging two batteries for the price of one. I showed you how to do this long ago but you ignore it. The fact is that you do not want to know, or rather do not want people to know. This is contrary to what Sterling wanted for this list and project. You ought to therefore close down the list and remove the name Bedini from it.

The following is the latest mischief against me from the moderators (Joe and Dave Ellis):

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Bedini_SG/message/4304

--- vlusta <dave_ellis@...> wrote:

> --- In Bedini_SG@yahoogroups.com, "acg_1001"

> <acg_1001@...> wrote:

>

> Just wanted to say if Rick ... wanted to drop in

> ...I wouldn't mind:)

>

>

> Oh boy... you are finally in heaven, but now the

> altitude could be

> adjusted.

>

> ~ dave

From: Thaelin Rizzori <thaelin@...>

Date: Mon Apr 24, 2006 9:54 pm

Subject: Re: [Bedini_SG] Re: All Monopole People Welcome

Does the song "That'll be the day" ring in here? I

posted here and got loaded on for it. But no problem.

I would like to order the book too but doubt he would

allow me to now.

thaelin

End of quote.

More along these lines continued after this post. As I said, you know why I don't post on this list. You would change my words. If you made me a moderator and I could see that I was not moderated then perhaps I may possibly respond to all the misinformation given. But that will be the day.

This claim about doubting that I would sell a book is also unjust. I do not deny people books for sale. Several people on the SG list have ordered and received this very book. Further, I never mentioned this book to any of you. Nor did I expect you to order it. This was a service I provided for this research because the publisher no longer exists. The lies continue:

From: "vlusta" <dave_ellis@...>

Date: Tue Apr 25, 2006 12:41 am

--- In Bedini_SG@yahoogroups.com, "acg_1001" <acg_1001@...> wrote: > "I would like to order the book too but doubt he would > allow me to now."

Joe, It hasn't helped Rick much, and if he is editing this material you only introduce another meaninless verbal avalanche. Save your $12 for string. :-) ~ dave

End of quote from Bedini_SG list.

How does Dave know it hasn't helped me much. I have stated exactly the opposite. I have said that this is a very important book to all I have discussed it with, and it did help me in several ways.

Secondly, I did not change anything. The book is exactly the same but for the fact that John asked that I put the Watson replication pictures in it. I have added no comments or statements.

Further, for Joe to accuse me of merely trying to make money is just vicious in a previous posting. I am a publisher and have expenses. And it costs to publish a book. Further, I have donated thousands of hours to helping people like you and you people have been most ungrateful and demanding. John has done so much more of this giving. He has given more information than anyone but Tesla. So the first opportunity you have you accuse, you put the worst construction on motives. $10 for a book of great importance. $2 for shipping! No one asked you to buy it.

This main moderator of the SG list goes by the alias Joe Friday and has an email acg_1001@yahoo.com. Looking at my tracker at the bottom of the screen I notice that he is working out of Sothern Methodist University around the clock. I checked the ISP of one email from this guy who is good friends with Jean M Cour (however the spelling) in France, 'Joe' is a recent new moderator of the Bedini_SG list (also owner of the Bedini_SG2 list, and recent joiner of the Bedini_SG3 list! and the one who caused the most trouble on the monopole list), and it indeed says: 129.119.133.172 Southern Methodist University. At 17:41:44 April 25 06 this letter was in pending and he clicked to this page from it. So why is someone or group of people from SMU interested in distracting people from learning this technology? Take a look at their departments: http://engr.smu.edu/departments/
Apparently the same Joe people have a Bedini webpage at SMU: http://sparky.cis.smu.edu/wca/motor_pictures/MainMotor.html

As for the list, you failed. Sterling long ago did the replication. You see the results he showed. You don't even believe them. You don't care for it. The purpose of this list was to show the two energies. You do not yet understand them or care about this radiant energy. All you want is free stuff I see. This has blinded you, or you want to blind others from finding freedom. You can't even see that the machine has free mechanical as Ron P just wrote. Go back to Sterling's data and setup. He has nothing hidden or secret about his setup. You all can build that easily as he did. Do the same tests. Then rest in the fact that something else is charging the secondary batteries than just regular electron flow. You don't have to see the secondary battery charge faster or at the same rate as the primary discharges to see this either. Just do the math boys. What does it take to rotate such a wheel and power the circuit? Show me some other circuit that can drive a fan or produce that mechanical while another battery gets fully charged. I showed that I can take a computer fan apart and remove the efficient circuit, and hook up a Bedini SG to it and run it at the same speed or faster with less watts WHILE charging another battery 1 to 1! Who can do that? I showed you how to do it. And I could show you more if you had some respect. I told you how I could drive my furnace fan blower with SG circuits while charging 1 to 1 with junkyard batteries. Just imagine what I could do with low impedance new batteries! Yes, the older and more sulfated a battery gets the higher its resistance therefore the less it receives this technology and radiant charge. You should know this by now.

You don't care to learn about radiant energy as you say in many posts. All you want is free power. You don't believe it exists. Anyone who can see it and tap into it knows how to make it free for themselves. If you are able to get electron flow to produce work at the same time that radiant energy is triggered, you can make the radiant do just as much or more work as the electron flow does. You must see the difference. John has showed us how to convert the radiant into electron flow. It is all over his website, Tom Bearden's website and books, and in John's numerous models he has shown the public. It is in big bold print what the converter or transducer is, but you ignore it. Instead you focus on other less important things and make them everything. I speak to "you" as I am referring to a united group of disinformationists set on preventing the proper learning of this technology.

Then I happen to discuss battery rotation and why that doesn't work very well with the SSG circuit. And you all get upset and all prejudiced about it. You didn't read this list carefully. THAT IS NOT THE ONLY CIRCUIT FOLKS!!! You were not meant to merely rotate batteries. Yes you can and still get some results, but that misses the point about the two energies. The Radiant needs to be converted first to be used again efficiently in the SSG. That is very easy to do and has been shown in different ways if you have eyes to see. It is so obvious it is ridiculous that people do not understand. You have not read the history people. You did not study well at all. Very poor students you are. You did not follow the technology at all. None of you even read John's book! Few read the keelynet posts. None did in context. There you would have seen that you could swap around the dual battery setup. WHY??? This was the kind of setup John would swap around. Now it should be even more obvious to you. Do you people not pay attention? Purposely obviously. Just because John gave the SSG setup does not mean that it has to do everything you want it to. Nor does it mean it is useless unless it does that. You do not care to read John for what he says specifically and wish to lump every setup together as if he is always speaking about every setup he has! He speaks in a context. You didn't care to read the context of the keelynet posts or the SSG posts. It is very easy to convert the negative or radiant energy into positive energy to be used on the front end with or without battery swapping. I have shown several ways to do that for NOTHING! NO LOSSES!!

The SSG project is COMPLETED. It is finished. It does what John said it would do. Again, you didn't read John right Miki (as you continually misquote what John said). You don't yet care to understand this other kind of energy and what OU means or 1 to 1 charging. What if I said to you that you could charge a big battery with a very small one at the front end? What if that charged 1 to 1? What if the battery was 100 times more capacity on the back end? You still would not care because you want two batteries charged instead!!! Why don't you guys go and get a little more dignified and considerate. All you want to do is jump down and accuse and throw suspicion on everything said or done. You can't even build it because you don't want to see it work. Even Clive, who claims now that bulbs lit up under load testing don't mean anything significant, refused for the longest time to build the inverted circuit because he said it was impossible to work. After much writing him he finally did build it and saw it did run contrary to his expert knowledge and experience (as claimed). What you guys don't care to see is what John has been saying all along. The meters do not show you the ether flow or radiant energy WHILE the machine is running. You can use the meters to see what is flowing and see it isn't much. Then you can use your meters to see what goes into loads like bulbs run after the machine is turned off. You can see that more work is done than is supposed to happen according to standard theory. And if you would get over your prejudices (or rather stop you disinformation suppression mission) you and others would see more work done so you would be able to improve upon that efficiency. I could respond to 1000 more bogus diversions and false claims of the several people on that list who are working together really. But everyone knows what the truth is now. It's all over boys. The truth is out and demonstrated. And people will run with it.

The conclusion of the matter is as follows:

There are two energies in this Simplified School Girl setup. Tom Bearden in Energy From the Vacuum tells us what they are in full (also on his website).

One is organized and the other is not. One is hot electricity and the other is cold which can boil a battery at room temperature. One is mass and is heavy and the other is just the opposite. There are some 25 different properties to learn about in this energy comparison. One, positive energy, is what you put in the front end, and negative energy is what comes out. You can't put negative energy back into the front and expect it to be working right as John said (this is not the circuit to do that). A battery will not properly convert the energy. BUT A CAPACITOR WILL! Thus you cannot just swap around batteries without transducing the energy first.

The negative energy does not show up on a meter. Thus when you charge a battery with this kind of energy (which has to be done the right way) you will see that you will get more work out of the battery under a load test than what you put into it (according to your meters and standard conventional theories). This shows you the two energies, and their differences. They are not compatible. Regular electron flow diminishes radiant energy flow when together.

Free radiant energy is about overpotential setups where two different potentials exist momentarily under the right switching circumstances where the vacuum rushes in the area of lower potential to fill it up (as opposed to electron flow charging/filling). The vacuum wishes for equilibrium, and when we sort of trick it with overpotentials we can get it to charge up batteries or run loads. This is what John has done in all his circuits. Each circuit does it in its own way. Each has a specific purpose. No circuit has all the options.

The SSG is a radiant mechanical oscillator and not technically a motor. There is a very narrow window in which to find optimum charging rates for the secondary battery while the draw on the front end is least. However, the SSG can also perform limited motor work such as a fan. While putting a small load on the setup you are able to actually get better efficiencies in most setups. I personally have been able to scale up with multitransistor and coil setups and run large mechanical loads while charging batteries still around 1 to 1. I have run fans that take 1 horsepower to run normally. The mechanical possibilities are not insignificant. However, the primary purpose is to be a mechanical oscillator.

There are many variations of this setup which I have replicated successfully. There are advantages to every setup. But you must appreciate the primary purpose of this project to appreciate them and successfully utilize them. Going back to the original School Girl will take you to the next step in this technology. As you follow the history over the last 22 years you will see more and more how it works and how to use it.

We have moved on from the Bedini_SG list project as it is completed. Do not look to that list for further details and advances as that list does not care to see the purpose and answers that have been given.

Respectfully,

Rick Freidrich